Gregg didn't withdraw his name numb nuts to give creedance to the notion that the GOP was being left out. And the GOP was being left so its not preposterous. And the GOP never said they were against any of these things; we just cannot afford them right now and they are not stimulus. As always, when a GOP member makes a choice you embellish and assume to ellicit hatred. You grasping at straws and you are pathetic.
Love the name calling. Typical neocon tactics. Face the facts your tired worn out dogmas have been rejected. By the way, were you concerned about the deficit spending under the Bush Administration??? Oh that's right we had to do that because we were cutting taxes so the wealthy could create jobs. Give me a break. Your intellectually bankrupt as the neocons bankrupted this country
Hey, there you are. I thought you slithered away under some rock. Wow. This name-calling is fun and it gets your attention. Remember, you're the one who can relate to name calling (ie domestic terrorists, neocons, grand obstructionist party, conservative talking heads, a blithering bull shit artist, you are a joke and a typical right wing moron!!!!!!!!,WAR MONGERING) Then you add in insinuations, half-truths and flat out lies: conservatives are of the belief that everyone gets what they have coming and if they can't make to hell with them. In addition, conservatives love to fabricate; to hell with this country; misrepresentations and fabrications that conservative politicians and talking heads continue to spew; massive tax cuts off the wealthy; Bush and Cheney bankrupted this nation; no credibility; loss of jobs during the Bush Administration the highest since Herbert Hoover!!!; The G.O.P.,the Grand Obstructionist Party is out to destroy America and they are proud of it!!!!!; love America or leave it; childless attempts to derail... the United States of America. I read many of your posts and I have yet to see any facts or figures. It appears to me that deep inside you know liberalism is nothing more than a hand-out which lowers production and increases taxes. It benefits no one in the long run except those who don't pay any taxes. Oh, I see one of your favorite slurs is neocon. Do you even know what it means? I'm serious here. It's okay, don't feel ashamed. It actually started in the 1920's to describe liberals who realized their mistakes and converted to conservatism. Here are some modern definitions... Bill Steigerwald (TRIBUNE-REVIEW Saturday, May 29, 2004) Neoconservatives are less skeptical of government than other conservatives. They are less worried about reducing the size of government, less enthusiastic about tax cuts, more concerned about forging national crusades that can tap either the American public's patriotism or its desire for reform (Hey TRex, sounds kinda like you and Obama) Paul Weyrich: They are mostly ex-liberals, by and large out of the intellectual community. These are people who came to the realization that modern liberalism was not the kind of liberalism that they had subscribed to George Will: Oh gosh, that's not simple. Neoconservatives are persons who in domestic policy often were former Democrats who felt that conservatives had erred in not accepting the post-New Deal role of the central government (again like you) You do not report facts; you never ever say why liberalism is better (wonder why); and you call people names that actually describe yourself. In short, you blurt out words of hatred searching for people to love to hate. You don't want to teach people; you only want to inflame their passion. I challenge you to come up with a MATURE response to all I said here. Not a snipit that you twist and turn and then go off on another tangent. Yes, you do that. Be objective. David Tothill
I am a red-blooded American who loves this country and have been around long enough to know that America is in decline if we don't do something about it!!!!
3 comments:
Gregg didn't withdraw his name numb nuts to give creedance to the notion that the GOP was being left out. And the GOP was being left so its not preposterous. And the GOP never said they were against any of these things; we just cannot afford them right now and they are not stimulus. As always, when a GOP member makes a choice you embellish and assume to ellicit hatred. You grasping at straws and you are pathetic.
Tothill:
Love the name calling. Typical neocon tactics. Face the facts your tired worn out dogmas have been rejected. By the way, were you concerned about the deficit spending under the Bush Administration??? Oh that's right we had to do that because we were cutting taxes so the wealthy could create jobs. Give me a break. Your intellectually bankrupt as the neocons bankrupted this country
Hey, there you are. I thought you slithered away under some rock. Wow. This name-calling is fun and it gets your attention. Remember, you're the one who can relate to name calling (ie domestic terrorists, neocons, grand obstructionist party, conservative talking heads, a blithering bull shit artist, you are a joke and a typical right wing moron!!!!!!!!,WAR MONGERING) Then you add in insinuations, half-truths and flat out lies: conservatives are of the belief that everyone gets what they have coming and if they can't make to hell with them. In addition, conservatives love to fabricate; to hell with this country; misrepresentations and fabrications that conservative politicians and talking heads continue to spew; massive tax cuts off the wealthy; Bush and Cheney bankrupted this nation; no credibility; loss of jobs during the Bush Administration the highest since Herbert Hoover!!!; The G.O.P.,the Grand Obstructionist Party is out to destroy America and they are proud of it!!!!!; love America or leave it; childless attempts to derail... the United States of America.
I read many of your posts and I have yet to see any facts or figures. It appears to me that deep inside you know liberalism is nothing more than a hand-out which lowers production and increases taxes. It benefits no one in the long run except those who don't pay any taxes.
Oh, I see one of your favorite slurs is neocon. Do you even know what it means? I'm serious here. It's okay, don't feel ashamed. It actually started in the 1920's to describe liberals who realized their mistakes and converted to conservatism. Here are some modern definitions...
Bill Steigerwald (TRIBUNE-REVIEW Saturday, May 29, 2004)
Neoconservatives are less skeptical of government than other conservatives. They are less worried about reducing the size of government, less enthusiastic about tax cuts, more concerned about forging national crusades that can tap either the American public's patriotism or its desire for reform (Hey TRex, sounds kinda like you and Obama)
Paul Weyrich: They are mostly ex-liberals, by and large out of the intellectual community. These are people who came to the realization that modern liberalism was not the kind of liberalism that they had subscribed to
George Will: Oh gosh, that's not simple. Neoconservatives are persons who in domestic policy often were former Democrats who felt that conservatives had erred in not accepting the post-New Deal role of the central government (again like you)
You do not report facts; you never ever say why liberalism is better (wonder why); and you call people names that actually describe yourself. In short, you blurt out words of hatred searching for people to love to hate. You don't want to teach people; you only want to inflame their passion.
I challenge you to come up with a MATURE response to all I said here. Not a snipit that you twist and turn and then go off on another tangent. Yes, you do that. Be objective.
David Tothill
Post a Comment